Data Maturity Model Framework

Data Maturity Model: The Complete Framework for Building a Data-Driven Organization

By Ruben Buitelaar · Framework Developer & Data Strategy Expert

Introduction: What Is a Data Maturity Model?

A data maturity model is a framework that describes the progressive stages an organization moves through as it develops its ability to leverage data for decision-making, optimization, and innovation. It provides both a diagnostic tool—showing you where you are today—and a roadmap—revealing the path to where you want to be.

In the fast-paced business world of today, organizations struggle to capture maximum value from their data. While leading organizations increasingly rely on data for their decision-making processes, others fail to fulfill this data-driven ambition. The urgency to transform has never been greater, but organizations often lack the knowledge to change their old, intuition-based way of working.

This raises the fundamental question: How do we build a data-driven organization?

The answer lies not in implementing disconnected analytics projects, but in understanding maturity as a journey—one that requires simultaneous advancement across technical capabilities, organizational culture, and strategic alignment.

Why Data Maturity Matters

Research consistently shows that companies emphasizing data-driven decision-making demonstrate higher performance. Yet the path from intention to execution remains unclear for most organizations. A data maturity model bridges this gap by:

  • Establishing your starting point

    (as-is situation)

  • Defining your destination

    (to-be situation)

  • Illuminating the path forward

    (strategic roadmap)

Without knowing what you're heading toward, you can never develop a plan to get there. Without understanding your current capabilities, you can't prioritize the right investments.

"The problem is not why organizations should become data-driven—that's well understood. The challenge is what to become and how to become it."

The Scanraven Data Maturity Model: A Research-Validated Framework

Origin and Validation

The Scanraven Data Maturity Model was developed through rigorous academic research at Leiden University, following established procedures for maturity model development in IT management. Unlike many industry frameworks that lack formal design methodology and rely on anecdotal evidence, this model features:

  • Systematic literature review of 8+ existing maturity models

  • Iterative development through multiple validation phases

  • Meta-evaluation by practitioners across industries

  • Statistical validation of all stages and dimensions

  • Assessment by 1,000+ organizations via our free assessment tool

The model synthesizes known theory and best practices from business intelligence, analytics, big data, and organizational transformation into a comprehensive, holistic framework.

What Makes This Model Different

Most data maturity models focus narrowly on analytical capabilities or technology sophistication. They treat analytics as an isolated activity within the organization. The Scanraven model takes a different approach:

Holistic Perspective

Equal emphasis on technical and organizational factors

Beyond Analytics

Includes Integration and Empowerment dimensions that position analytics within broader organizational context

Actionable Insight

Each stage provides specific recommendations, not just descriptions

Validated Framework

Every component has been statistically validated for relevance and clarity

Stages

The 5 Stages of Data Maturity

Data maturity is not a binary state—it's a progressive journey. Organizations move through distinct stages, each characterized by specific capabilities, challenges, and opportunities. The Scanraven model defines five stages:

Maturity Model Chart
Explore all stages in depth →

Stage 1: Reporting

The Foundation Stage

Characteristics:

  • Growing interest in using data to support decision-making

  • Desire to move from intuition-based to evidence-based decisions

  • Basic reports showing historical performance

  • Data stored in spreadsheets on local computers or siloed databases

  • Ad hoc governance (if any)

Key Objectives:

  • Determine which data needs to be visible

  • Source and report critical data

  • Create basic dashboards with the most important metrics

  • Identify core competencies where analytics can make the biggest impact

  • Define basic responsibilities and decision domains

Typical Challenges:

  • Proliferation of spreadsheets with no single source of truth

  • Data residing in functional silos

  • Lack of skills to plan and manage a data program

  • Uncertainty about where to start

Organizations in the Reporting stage focus on describing what happened. The goal is to visualize existing data and create the foundation for an analytical future.
Read the complete Reporting stage guide →

Stage 2: Analyzing

The Insight Stage

Characteristics:

  • Analytics has an official place in organizational strategy

  • Data stored in a central data warehouse with ETL processes

  • Analytical models created to predict future events

  • Data scientists trained in data mining techniques

  • Growing executive sponsorship

Key Objectives:

  • Determine which data is relevant for deeper analysis

  • Define more advanced KPIs and track them over time

  • Create analytical models backed by statistical methods

  • Train or attract data scientists to dive deeper into data

  • Professionalize the data infrastructure

Typical Challenges:

  • Cultural resistance from those who "have always worked this way"

  • Need for clear direction from leadership

  • Struggle to translate insight into action

  • Growing complexity of data management

Organizations in the Analyzing stage focus on diagnosing why things happened. The birthplace of insight shifts from the manager reading a report to the analytics department.
Read the complete Analyzing stage guide →

Stage 3: Optimizing

The Integration Stage

Characteristics:

  • Large-scale data collection (user behavior, customer interactions)

  • Machine learning models predicting future behavior

  • Real-time dashboards revealing operational insight

  • Analytics integrated into production systems

  • Automated integration of insight into business processes

Key Objectives:

  • Collect data at scale to feed data-driven models

  • Use customer data to personalize experiences

  • Create processes to rapidly detect and deal with anomalies

  • Automate the use of analytical insight into existing processes

  • Focus on turning data into actions, not just insight

Typical Challenges:

  • Reduced urgency after initial success

  • Technical complexity of real-time integration

  • Need for streaming data architecture (push vs. pull)

  • Balancing accuracy improvements against diminishing returns

Organizations in the Optimizing stage focus on predicting what will happen. The goal is to operationalize insight—integrate it automatically into business processes.
Read the complete Optimizing stage guide →

Stage 4: Empowering

The Democratization Stage

Characteristics:

  • Third-party data augmenting internal data sources

  • Self-service BI tools available across the organization

  • Internal metrics tracking process quality and performance

  • Decentralized data scientists with domain knowledge

  • Analytics embedded in products ("smart products")

Key Objectives:

  • Create clear data governance strategy that scales

  • Distribute analysis closer to relevant departments

  • Scale analytics with self-service BI capabilities

  • Combine domain knowledge with analytical knowledge

  • Enable rapid integration of analytical features into products

Typical Challenges:

  • Ensuring data quality with broader access

  • Training non-technical users in statistical interpretation

  • Maintaining governance while enabling agility

  • Retaining analytical culture as it spreads

Organizations in the Empowering stage focus on prescribing how to make things happen. Data-driven decision-making becomes everyone's responsibility, not just the analytics team's.
Read the complete Empowering stage guide →

Stage 5: Innovating

The Transformation Stage

Characteristics:

  • Data is among the most valuable organizational assets

  • Autonomous analytics services assist model building

  • Innovation accounting measures new venture success

  • AI/ML capabilities at the leading edge

  • Culture of continuous improvement deeply ingrained

Key Objectives:

  • Continue seeking new data sources from new products

  • Leverage unstructured data (voice, images)

  • Track new ventures using innovation accounting methods

  • Invest in platforms that accelerate analytical model development

  • Use analytics to make decisions at both macro and micro scales

Typical Challenges:

  • Staying ahead as competitors catch up

  • Maintaining innovation velocity

  • Balancing exploration with exploitation

  • Ensuring ethical use of advanced capabilities

Organizations in the Innovating stage focus on discovering what they can make happen. Continuous improvement becomes second nature, and analytical transformation becomes a journey that never ends.
Read the complete Innovating stage guide →
Dimensions

The 10 Dimensions of Data Maturity

Maturity isn't one-dimensional. Organizations must develop across multiple dimensions simultaneously to achieve true data-driven success. The Scanraven model defines ten dimensions—five technical and five organizational—that together provide a holistic view of data maturity.

Explore all dimensions in depth →

Data

Data is the fuel for all data-driven activities. This dimension assesses how you source, store, manage, and govern your data assets.

Key Aspects:

  • Storage: From spreadsheets → siloed databases → data warehouse → data lake → distributed edge processing

  • Sources: From operational systems → purpose-collected data → behavioral data → third-party data → unstructured data

  • Governance: Data quality, security, privacy, lifecycle management

Why It Matters:

Without quality data, even the most sophisticated analytical capabilities produce unreliable results. Data governance becomes critical as volume and variety increase.

Read the complete Data dimension guide →

Metrics

If data is about input, metrics are about measuring output. This dimension assesses how you define, collect, and use performance indicators.

Key Aspects:

  • Sophistication: From plain measurements → aggregated trends → composite metrics → analytical KPIs → predictive indicators

  • Timeliness: From after-the-fact reporting → on-demand → real-time → predictive

  • Usage: From reporting → insight generation → optimization → empowerment → innovation

Why It Matters:

The right metrics communicate organizational priorities, enable performance management, and prevent focus on trivial tasks. Poorly designed KPIs can incentivize counterproductive behavior.

Read the complete Metrics dimension guide →

Skills

The people in your organization and the analytical skills they possess form a vital part of the analytical process. This dimension assesses both specialized analytical capabilities and general data literacy.

Key Aspects:

  • Analytical Skills: From planning/management → visualization → data mining → machine learning → AI development

  • Focus: Describing (what happened) → Diagnosing (why) → Predicting (what will) → Prescribing (how to) → Innovating (what's possible)

  • General Skills: Basic data literacy across the workforce

Why It Matters:

Human capital is the greatest asset of an analytical organization. Skills gaps are the most common barrier to data maturity advancement.

Read the complete Skills dimension guide →

Technology

Technology is the catalyst for data-driven activities, playing a role in every step of the analytics process: collecting, extracting, storing, analyzing, visualizing, integrating, and connecting.

Key Aspects:

  • Infrastructure: From ad hoc scripts → basic platform → scalable infrastructure → modular architecture

  • Capabilities: From reporting → analysis → optimization → personalization → rapid innovation

Why It Matters:

The right technology enables speed and scale. Poor technology choices create technical debt that constrains future advancement.

Read the complete Technology dimension guide →

Integration

Integration is often overlooked but crucial—it's how analytical insight flows back to the business and turns into action.

Key Aspects:

  • Method: From manual reports → automated dashboards → production system integration → distributed analytics

  • Action Capabilities: From viewing reports → identifying problems → predicting outcomes → prescribing actions → macro/micro decisions

Why It Matters:

Fantastic reports are worthless if no one reads them or no resources exist to take action. The faster insight turns into action, the more value is created.

Read the complete Integration dimension guide →

Leadership

Leadership is a critical factor determining the success of an analytical transformation. Without executive sponsorship, analytics initiatives struggle for resources and organizational support.

Key Aspects:

  • Activities: From learning → initiating → encouraging → leading by example → embracing transformation

  • Attitude: From interested → exploring → convinced → committed → passionate

Why It Matters:

Leadership provides the runway for analytics to take off. A strong advocate (champion) is required to set efforts in motion and allocate necessary resources.

Read the complete Leadership dimension guide →

Culture

Culture plays a crucial role in the acceptance and adoption of a data-driven strategy. It stretches beyond the analytics department to encompass the entire organization.

Key Aspects:

  • Attitude: From unaware → skeptical → interested → engaged → actively promoting

  • Adoption: From no initiative → inhibited adoption → experimenting → continuous improvement → sustainable advantage

Why It Matters:

Culture is a sustainable competitive advantage because it cannot be easily replicated by competitors. Leadership provides the runway, but culture keeps analytics flying.

Read the complete Culture dimension guide →

Strategy

Strategy determines what role analytics will play in the organization and aligns data initiatives with business objectives.

Key Aspects:

  • Role of Analytics: From absent → ad hoc → official → cornerstone → driving force

  • Strategic Focus: From no strategy → ad hoc initiatives → formalizing processes → radical improvement → innovation/transformation

Why It Matters:

Without strategic alignment, analytics efforts become scattered and fail to deliver meaningful business value.

Read the complete Strategy dimension guide →

Agility

Agility focuses on how to adapt, execute, and bring strategy to life. Analytical transformation requires a massive paradigm shift—from intuition to evidence-based reasoning.

Key Aspects:

  • Process Maturity: From non-existing → informal → formalized → optimized → facilitating innovation

  • Roles & Responsibilities: Clear decision rights and accountability structures

Why It Matters:

Successful strategic execution requires clarifying decision rights and defining who is responsible for specific decisions. Without clear responsibilities, insights get ignored and change gets blocked.

Read the complete Agility dimension guide →

Empowerment

Empowerment refers to enabling all employees to engage in analytics—putting the right tools, techniques, and information in the hands of workers so they can discover opportunities and continuously improve.

Key Aspects:

  • Tools: From no access → basic reports → dashboards → experiment management → self-service BI → autonomous analytics

  • Education: From no knowledge → identifying relevant data → data literacy → scientific method → basic analytics → capturing maximum value

  • Information: From unavailable → ad hoc requests → scheduled reports → on-demand → real-time → pushed/anticipated

Why It Matters:

Data-driven organizations give employees access to data and analytical capabilities. Combined with the right knowledge and mindset, these unlock opportunities for innovation and continuous improvement.

Read the complete Empowerment dimension guide →

Comparing Data Maturity Models

The Landscape of Data Maturity Frameworks

Numerous data maturity models exist, each with different focus areas and design philosophies. Understanding their differences helps you choose the right framework for your organization—or understand why a more comprehensive approach is needed.

AspectIndustry ModelsScanraven Model
ValidationOften anecdotal, grey literatureAcademic methodology, statistical validation
DocumentationLimited, proprietaryFully documented design process
DimensionsTypically 3-5, technology-focused10 dimensions, balanced technical/organizational
ActionabilityGeneral principlesSpecific recommendations per stage/dimension
Integration & EmpowermentUsually absent or implicitExplicit dimensions with detailed guidance
AssessmentQualitative or expensive consultingQuantitative, self-service, validated questions

Key Differentiator: The Empowering Stage

Most traditional maturity models—particularly those rooted in business intelligence—effectively end at Stage 3 (Optimizing). They focus on building analytical capabilities within dedicated teams.

The Scanraven model's Empowering stage represents a fundamental shift: moving from "having analytics" to "being analytical." It's the difference between:

  • A company with a data science team → A company where everyone thinks analytically

  • Analytics as a department → Analytics as a capability

  • Insight delivered to decision-makers → Decision-makers creating their own insights

This distinction matters because sustainable competitive advantage comes not from having analytics tools, but from an organization-wide culture of data-driven decision-making.

Assessing Your Data Maturity

The Importance of Assessment

Change management starts with understanding where you are. A maturity assessment:

  1. Establishes your as-is situation across all dimensions
  2. Reveals strengths and weaknesses you may not have recognized
  3. Prioritizes improvement efforts based on gaps and interdependencies
  4. Creates a baseline for measuring future progress

Assessment Approaches

Qualitative Assessment:

  • Interviews conducted by maturity model experts

  • Accurate; takes nuances into account

  • Time-consuming and expensive

  • Harder to quantify and benchmark

Quantitative Assessment:

  • Structured questionnaire with scoring model

  • Fast to conduct; no expert required

  • Easily quantified and comparable

  • May miss situational nuances

Recommended: A quantitative assessment provides an accessible starting point. If results indicate areas of concern, follow up with deeper qualitative investigation.

The Scanraven Data Maturity Assessment

Our assessment tool is designed around several key principles:

Speed: Complete in approximately 30 minutes

Accessibility: No expert knowledge required

Validation: Every question statistically validated for importance and clarity

Actionability: Results include specific recommendations for your maturity level

How It Works:

  1. Answer 2-3 questions per dimension (26 questions total)
  2. Each question presents maturity statements from Stage 1 to Stage 5
  3. Select the statement that best describes your current state
  4. Receive instant scoring per dimension and overall
  5. Access personalized recommendations based on your results

What You'll Receive:

  • Overall maturity score and stage placement

  • Score per dimension with radar visualization

  • Dimension-by-dimension breakdown of your current capabilities

  • Specific action items relevant to your maturity level

  • Strategic roadmap for advancement

Building a Roadmap for Data Maturity

From Assessment to Action

Assessment alone doesn't create change—it informs strategy. Here's how to translate assessment results into a practical improvement plan:

Step 1: Analyze Your Profile

Your dimension scores reveal your maturity profile. Common patterns include: Technology-heavy (high Technology and Data scores, lower Culture and Leadership), Strategy-light (good capabilities but lacking strategic direction), Skills-constrained (strong leadership support but execution bottleneck), Integration gap (good analysis but insight doesn't reach action).

Step 2: Identify Critical Gaps

Not all dimensions require equal attention. Prioritize based on: Business impact (which improvements would most affect strategic goals?), Dependencies (which dimensions are prerequisites for others?), Feasibility (which improvements can you realistically achieve?).

Step 3: Set Stage-Appropriate Goals

Don't try to jump from Stage 1 to Stage 5. Each stage builds on the previous: Reporting → Analyzing (focus on insight, not just visibility), Analyzing → Optimizing (focus on integration, not just analysis), Optimizing → Empowering (focus on distribution, not just optimization), Empowering → Innovating (focus on transformation, not just empowerment).

Step 4: Build Your 90-Day Plan

For each priority dimension: Define 2-3 specific initiatives, Assign clear ownership, Establish measurable outcomes, Schedule check-in reviews.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • 1.

    Over-investing in technology

    Organizations often focus on technological factors while underinvesting in organizational dimensions. Our research shows this imbalance is common—and it explains why many analytics programs fail despite strong tools.

  • 2.

    Skipping stages

    Each stage builds capabilities needed for the next. Attempting to implement Empowering-level self-service BI without Optimizing-level integration infrastructure creates frustration.

  • 3.

    Neglecting culture

    Technology can be purchased; culture must be cultivated. Leadership and culture dimensions require sustained attention over time.

  • 4.

    Focusing on big wins only

    Small improvements compound. A culture of continuous improvement delivers more sustainable results than occasional major initiatives.

Applications of the Data Maturity Model

As a Standalone Assessment

Use the maturity assessment as an initial diagnostic to understand your current capabilities, identify priority improvement areas, communicate data maturity status to stakeholders, and justify investment in data initiatives.

As a Strategic Framework

Use the full model as a blueprint for transformation to define your target state, build a multi-year roadmap, align initiatives with stage-appropriate priorities, and create shared vocabulary across the organization.

As a Cross-Sectional Assessment

Deploy across multiple business units or teams to compare maturity profiles across departments, identify centers of excellence and areas needing support, enable knowledge sharing between teams, and standardize data practices organization-wide.

As a Measure of Progress

Repeat assessments periodically to track advancement, measure improvement over time, validate that initiatives are working, adjust strategy based on progress, and celebrate wins to maintain momentum.

Frequently Asked Questions

General Questions

Assessment Questions

Model Questions

Quick Takeaways

  • Data maturity describes your organization's ability to leverage data for decision-making, optimization, and innovation

  • The journey consists of five stages: Reporting → Analyzing → Optimizing → Empowering → Innovating

  • Ten dimensions capture the full scope: Data, Metrics, Skills, Technology, Integration (technical) and Leadership, Culture, Strategy, Agility, Empowerment (organizational)

  • Most organizations are in early stages and often over-invest in technology while under-investing in organizational factors

  • Assessment provides the foundation for strategic planning and progress measurement

  • The Empowering stage—distributing analytical capabilities across the organization—is what distinguishes data-driven organizations from organizations that merely do analytics

Start Your Data Maturity Journey

Understanding your current state is the first step toward transformation. Our free assessment takes 30 minutes and provides:

  • Overall maturity score and stage placement

  • Dimension-by-dimension breakdown

  • Personalized recommendations

  • Strategic roadmap based on your results

Or explore the framework further:

About the Author

Ruben Buitelaar

Data Scientist & Product Manager

Ruben Buitelaar is the founder of Scanraven and the creator of the Data Maturity Model. He developed this framework as part of his Master's thesis research at Leiden University's ICT in Business program, where it was academically validated and has since been used by over 1,000 organizations worldwide.

With a background in software engineering and data strategy, Ruben combines technical depth with practical business understanding. His work focuses on helping organizations bridge the gap between knowing they should be data-driven and actually becoming data-driven.

Credentials:

  • Data Scientist & Product Manager

  • MSc ICT in Business, Leiden University

  • Creator of the Data-Driven Maturity Assessment (1,000+ organizational assessments)

  • Founder, Scanraven

Connect: